1. Welcome to the Wrestlingsmarks Forum!

    I see that you are not currently registered on our forum. It only takes a second, and you can even login with your Facebook! If you would like to register now, pease click here: Register

    Once registered please introduce yourself in our introduction thread which can be found here: Introduction Board


    Dismiss Notice

Raw Thread June 11

Discussion in 'Raw' started by Deezy, Jun 11, 2018.

  1. Chris

    Chris It's me, it's me

    Brock Lesnar is the longest reigning world champion in WWE since the 1980s. Is that better?
     
  2. Admin Post
    Smarkslayer

    Smarkslayer Tomb Raider

    That was my point. Raw makes its title the top title. But Raw will eventually draft the WWE back or unify the belts.

    The WWE Title always comes back to being the primary belt.
     
  3. Admin Post
    Smarkslayer

    Smarkslayer Tomb Raider

    I think you've just found Vince's plan for turning Roman into the company's biggest babyface.
     
  4. Admin Post
    Smarkslayer

    Smarkslayer Tomb Raider

    I guess if we have to make that a thing. I just don't see the point.
     
  5. Cwalker

    Cwalker That's What I Do!

    randyorton
    romanreigns
    robertroode
    antoniocesaro
    ajstyles
    jaylethal
    It’s gonna be a long 9 years
     
  6. Cwalker

    Cwalker That's What I Do!

    randyorton
    romanreigns
    robertroode
    antoniocesaro
    ajstyles
    jaylethal
    Can’t we just end this debate by saying Brock Lesnar passed CM Punk on the longest reigning World Champion list
     
  7. Chris

    Chris It's me, it's me

    It's literally a fact though lol WWE always does this like how they always billed JBL as the longest reigning wwe champ in smackdown history, like why do I give a fuck about that? But that doesn't make it any less true. I'm not arguing if the reign is better or worse or what should be recognized all I'm saying is WWE is saying a fact and just because there's a lot of qualifiers for it doesn't make it any less true.

    They're just trying to be like regular sports tbh you see these "records" that get broken on sportscenter? It'll be like only player in history with 30 points, 13 rebounds and 5 steals on the second Tuesday of a month and they act like that's a record because records are very arbitrary, you can almost make anything a record of you qualified it right
     
  8. Chris

    Chris It's me, it's me

    No because they're saying world championships can't be compared for some reason that's the whole problem
     
  9. Admin Post
    Smarkslayer

    Smarkslayer Tomb Raider

    If there's an abstract list on wikipedia that counts all world champions reigns together, sure.
     
  10. Admin Post
    Smarkslayer

    Smarkslayer Tomb Raider

    The problem really lies in WWE having two world titles in the first place. One company should really only have one world champion. Brock Lesnar right now would have surpassed CM Punk's record and replaced him as the 7th longest reigning WWE Champion.

    Prior to like 2011, WWE never mixed records between its belts. It's just silly.
     
  11. Admin Post
    Smarkslayer

    Smarkslayer Tomb Raider

    Even as a "fact" you have to add in the qualifier since the 80s. Why do we care who is the longest person to hold a belt since a certain decade?
     
  12. Chris

    Chris It's me, it's me

    I know when Orton won the WHC they acknowledged that he passed Brock as youngest world champion despite Brock gaining the record by winning the WWE title
     
    Cwalker and Deezy like this.
  13. Chris

    Chris It's me, it's me

    I've said multiple times I don't care, I'm just saying they aren't wrong and I mean we care bc it's still impressive? We cared when Punk was having that long reign not because he was gonna break the record but bc it was impressive so they added a qualifier to it to show that while it wasn't breaking an actual record it was notable
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2018
    Cwalker likes this.
  14. Deezy

    Deezy Well-Known Member

    brethart2
    newjack
    ddp
    therock
    nwo
    wolfpac
    Guess we should eliminate the entire "triple crown" accomplishment since there's no European title.
     
  15. Chris

    Chris It's me, it's me

    I think WWE actually acknowledged that they changed the definitions of triple crown and grand slam so now we just have new and old criteria but that's a whole other can of worms lmao
     

Share This Page