#Raw Discussion, Feb 13: Bayley challenges Raw Women's Champion Charlotte Flair in Sin City showdown

[Deezy]

 

[Drew]

It's disgusting how much better the SD women's division is than Raws

Yep. Wouldn't have thought it a couple months ago. But it's pretty much 3 girls at the top of Raw that are probably better than SD if that right now and that's it.

SD is much deeper though. I'll take their roster top to bottom over the Raw girls.


BTW just caught up. WTF was that Emma shit? Talk about a stupidly done, over hyped, make over that drug on over a month too long for nothing.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

Three women have now won the belt and each have had more than two weeks with it.

And yes, they feature more women's matches than Raw does and with less time to boot.

3 matches at Elimination Chamber. I assume that's a WWE record.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

I love Kelly Kelly but I can't see her among this new direction. Maybe put her on Total Divas as a replacement.

 

[Sabretooth]

LEL because they have one legit contender and a bunch of side feuds because of the lack of star power on that show?

You actually give me autism. They're not side feuds. Only one person can challenge for the belt at a time so therefore the other women have feuds. And they don't have this hot potato bullshit where they're so worried about a ppv streak that they only have the champion drop the title on Raw cause a streak is more important than the championship integrity apparently. They put Sasha and Charlotte in every stipulation match under the sun but none of it meant shit cause you knew the outcome. The matches were good sure but there was no suspense. Others on this forum agree with me as well but I'm sure you'll argue for the sake of arguing so go for it.

 

[Cwalker]

What's the over/under that she gave someone a BJ?

 

[Sabretooth]

What's the over/under that she gave someone a BJ?

Hoes don't do that unless they have something to gain.

 

[Deezy]

You actually give me autism. They're not side feuds. Only one person can challenge for the belt at a time so therefore the other women have feuds. And they don't have this hot potato bullshit where they're so worried about a ppv streak that they only have the champion drop the title on Raw cause a streak is more important than the championship integrity apparently. They put Sasha and Charlotte in every stipulation match under the sun but none of it meant shit cause you knew the outcome. The matches were good sure but there was no suspense. Others on this forum agree with me as well but I'm sure you'll argue for the sake of arguing so go for it.

You really do have autism, I was talking about smackdown forcing side feuds we really don't care about because of their anemic midcard.

 

[Sabretooth]

You really do have autism, I was talking about smackdown forcing side feuds we really don't care about because of their anemic midcard.

The only we is you. Everyone else cares about the side feuds.

 

[Deezy]

The only we is you. Everyone else cares about the side feuds.

Thanks for confirming your autism.

It just makes everything so clear now.

 

[Crippler]

 

[Dale]

The only we is you. Everyone else cares about the side feuds.

I'm gonna call BS right there. I love the women as much as everyone else but if you're gonna act like you were excited when Naomi/Bliss was announced or you're enjoying Nattie/Nikki then I'm gonna have to think you're telling porkies.

 

[Sabretooth]

I'm gonna call BS right there. I love the women as much as everyone else but if you're gonna act like you were excited when Naomi/Bliss was announced or you're enjoying Nattie/Nikki then I'm gonna have to think you're telling porkies.

Yes I did.

 

[Kross Rhodes]

I'm gonna call BS right there. I love the women as much as everyone else but if you're gonna act like you were excited when Naomi/Bliss was announced or you're enjoying Nattie/Nikki then I'm gonna have to think you're telling porkies.

Naomi and Bliss isn't even a side feud which is what they're arguing about. As for excited? Perhaps not specifically for that match, but I'm forced to watch Titus O'Neil, so at the very least I enjoy Nikki and Nattie knowing women on SmackDown Live are being showcased.

 

[Deezy]

So forcing yourself to enjoy a feud because you don't like a guy who hasn't been on TV in weeks means.....Smackdown women feuds aren't just place holders because a multi man mainevent match gutted their entire midcard?