LB presents: The Marvel Cinematic Universe Thread

[Cwalker]

Nah mayne.....he currently imploding his career and suing everyone.

With Farrah Fawcett hair

 

[Y2Jayne]

Kang as a character was done as soon as they had him beaten by ants.

 

[Apoho Creed]

Kang as a character was done as soon as they had him beaten by ants.

As strong as Kang is he got it from suped up Ants it was bound to happen. If I had any problems with that film it didn't have anything to do with Kang it was the stuff on the outside including me wanting to see Ant-Man die.

 

[Y2Jayne]

He was supposed to be the new Thanos in Phase 4 to 6, not even Ant-Man should have beaten him. But it was stupid to have him in that movie in the first place.

 

[Deezy]

Loki beat him........that's like having a jobber beat Vader in 94.

 

[Cwalker]

2 words…

Doctor Doom!

There…villain problem solved

 

[Chris]

Maybe hindsight bc I did like the Kang character but I don't think he would have been that successful going forward as the "new Thanos" anyway bc that's what everyone was already comparing him to.

They have plenty of villains for one or two movies to use and they can have Doom building in the background like they did Thanos, that's why he worked so well. Not like Thanos was the main villain in a Thor movie in phase 1

 

[Deezy]

Go with Galactus......the only real baddie people know.